d2cre b6 fvb cg tg drd2 cre er44gsat mmucd (Mutant Mouse Resource & Research Center)
Structured Review

D2cre B6 Fvb Cg Tg Drd2 Cre Er44gsat Mmucd, supplied by Mutant Mouse Resource & Research Center, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/drd2/adora2a+b6+cg+cre+fvb+kg139gsat+mmucd+tg/pmc12969090-36-0-3
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "The role of dopamine-sensitive motor cortical circuits in the development and execution of skilled forelimb movements"
Article Title: The role of dopamine-sensitive motor cortical circuits in the development and execution of skilled forelimb movements
Journal: iScience
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.114983
Figure Legend Snippet: Head-fixed mice learn to perform skilled forelimb movements to obtain a reward (A) Representation of injecting AAV9-hSyn-GRAB DA2h and AAV1-Syn-Flex-NES-jRGECO1a into M1. Coronal sections obtained from D1Cre and D2Cre mice showing expression of GRAB DA2h (green) and jRGECO1a (red) in the M1 forelimb area (brain slices are 0.5 mm anterior to the bregma). Scale bars, 500 μm. Magnification: 20×. See also for the histological map of GRAB DA2h and jRGECO1a expression and fiber tip placements. (B) Representation of the task in which head-fixed mice perform skilled forelimb movements with a joystick to obtain a delayed reward, and a fiber photometry setup for simultaneous recording of DA dynamics and population level Ca 2+ activity in the M1 forelimb area. See also for representative traces of neuronal Ca 2+ and DA signals acquired during training. (C) Increase in the number of rewarded joystick movements in D1Cre mice during training. (D) Movement kinematic parameters obtained from the early and late sessions in D1Cre mice showing that the average movement amplitude and velocity increased between training phases. (Left to right) Distribution of movement amplitudes, movement amplitude, and joystick velocity at the time of threshold crossing. (E) Individual movement trajectories of an example D1Cre mouse aligned to the initial joystick position (black dot), and preferred movement direction in the group of D1Cre animals (based on all extracted trajectories). (F) Change in movement similarity in D1Cre mice (based on the average distance between pairwise trajectories). (Left to right) Similarity between the early and late sessions; similarity within the late session. (G–J) Same as (C)–(F) for D2Cre mice. In (C)–(J), data were obtained from 14 D1Cre (10 Cre+ and 4 Cre-) and 13 D2Cre (10 Cre+ and 3 Cre-) animals. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Paired t test; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗ p < 0.05.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Activity Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: DA dynamics in the M1 encode execution of skilled forelimb movement and reward consumption (A) Peri-event plots of the average normalized DA signal in D1Cre mice aligned to threshold cross (top) and binned data analyzed at 1-s intervals (bottom). (Left to right) Data are presented as within-session (early or late) comparisons with respect to the baseline (BL) and between-session comparisons of movement- and reward-related periods (early vs. late). (B) Peri-event plots of the average normalized Ca 2+ signal in D1Cre mice aligned to threshold cross (top) and binned data analyzed at 1-s intervals (bottom). (Left to right) Data are presented as within-session (early or late) comparisons with respect to the BL and between-session comparisons of movement- and reward-related periods (early vs. late). (C) Peri-event plots of the average lick rate (licks/s) in D1Cre mice aligned to threshold cross (top) and binned data analyzed at 1-s intervals (bottom). (Left to right) Data are presented as within-session (early or late) comparisons with respect to the BL and between-session comparisons of movement- and reward-related periods (early vs. late). (D–F) Same as (A)–(C) for D2Cre mice. In (A)–(F), data were obtained from 14 D1Cre (10 Cre+ and 4 Cre-) and 13 D2Cre (10 Cre+ and 3 Cre-) animals. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Repeated-measure one-way ANOVA; multiple comparisons: BL mean vs. every other mean, movement (0–1 s) mean vs. reward (1–2 s) mean; Bonferroni’s post hoc test; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗ p < 0.05; or paired t test; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗ p < 0.05. Dashed lines indicate joystick movement (threshold crossing) and reward delivery. See also for comparisons between D1Cre and D2Cre mice and cross-correlations between DA and Ca 2+ signals.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: The neural response in the M1 reflects the movement vigor (A and B) Movement kinematic parameters obtained from the low- and high-amplitude trials during regular threshold session in D1Cre and D2Cre mice showing the difference in response vigor. (Left to right) Distribution of movement amplitudes, movement amplitude, and joystick velocity at the time of threshold crossing. (C) Peri-event plots of the average normalized DA signal in D1Cre mice aligned to threshold cross (top) and comparisons of movement- and reward-related periods (analyzed at 1-s intervals) between low- and high-amplitude trials (bottom). (D) Peri-event plots of the average normalized Ca 2+ signal in D1Cre mice aligned to threshold cross (top) and comparisons of movement- and reward-related periods (analyzed at 1-s intervals) between low- and high-amplitude trials (bottom). (E) Peri-event plots of the average lick rate (licks/s) in D1Cre mice aligned to threshold cross (top) and comparisons of movement- and reward-related periods (analyzed at 1-s intervals) between low and high amplitude trials (bottom). (F–H) Same as (C)–(E) for D2Cre mice. In (A)–(H), data were obtained from 14 D1Cre (10 Cre+ and 4 Cre-) and 13 D2Cre (10 Cre+ and 3 Cre-) animals. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Paired t test; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗ p < 0.05. Dashed lines indicate joystick movement (threshold crossing) and reward delivery. See also for comparisons between D1Cre and D2Cre mice.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: The neural response in the M1 reflects the movement vigor during the increased threshold session (A and B) Movement kinematic parameters obtained from the low- and high-amplitude trials during the increased threshold session in D1Cre and D2Cre mice. (Left to right) Distribution of movement amplitudes, movement amplitude, and joystick velocity at the time of threshold crossing. (C) Peri-event plots of the average normalized DA signal in D1Cre mice aligned to threshold cross (top) and comparisons of movement- and reward-related periods (analyzed at 1-s intervals) between low- and high-amplitude trials (bottom). (D) Peri-event plots of the average normalized Ca 2+ signaling D1Cre mice aligned to threshold cross (top) and comparisons of movement- and reward-related periods (analyzed at 1-s intervals) between low- and high-amplitude trials (bottom). (E) Peri-event plots of the average lick rate (licks/s) in D1Cre mice aligned to threshold cross (top) and comparisons of movement- and reward-related periods (analyzed at 1-s intervals) between low- and high-amplitude trials (bottom). (F–H) Same as (C)–(E) for D2Cre mice. In (A)–(H) Data were obtained from 14 D1Cre (10 Cre+ and 4 Cre-), and 12 D2Cre (10 Cre+ and 2 Cre-) animals. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Paired t test; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗ p < 0.05. Dashed lines indicate joystick movement (threshold crossing) and reward delivery. See also for comparisons between D1Cre and D2Cre mice.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: DA in the M1 signals actual reward availability during skilled performance (A) Peri-event plots of the average normalized DA signal in D1Cre mice aligned to threshold cross (top) and binned data analyzed at 1-s intervals (bottom). (Left to right) Data are presented as within-session (delay or omission) comparisons with respect to the baseline (BL). (B) Peri-event plots of the average normalized Ca 2+ signal in D1Cre mice aligned to threshold cross (top) and binned data analyzed at 1-s intervals (bottom). (Left to right) Data are presented as within-session (delay or omission) comparisons with respect to the BL. (C) Peri-event plots of the average lick rate (licks/s) in D1Cre mice aligned to threshold cross (top) and binned data analyzed at 1-s intervals (bottom). (Left to right) Data are presented as within-session (delay or omission) comparisons with respect to the BL. (D–F) Same as (A)–(C) for D2Cre mice. In (A)–(F), data for “delayed reward” analysis were obtained from 14 D1Cre (10 Cre+ and 4 Cre-) and 13 D2Cre (10 Cre+ and 3 Cre-) animals and for “omission” analysis from 9 D1Cre (7 Cre+ and 2 Cre-) and 8 D2Cre (8 Cre+) animals. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Repeated-measure one-way ANOVA; multiple comparisons: BL mean vs. every other mean, movement (0–1 s) mean vs. expected reward (1–2 s) mean, expected reward (1–2 s) mean vs. actual reward (3–4 s) mean; Bonferroni’s post hoc test; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗ p < 0.05 See also for comparisons between D1Cre and D2Cre mice.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: A subset of D1+ and D2+ neurons of the M1 contacts long-range targets (A) Representation of the four major areas of rAAV2-Retro-EYFP and Fluoro-Green injections: primary motor cortex (M1), dorsolateral striatum (DLS), thalamus (Thal), and pontine nucleus (PN). See also for representative histology of the injection sites. (B and C) Coronal sections obtained from D1-tdTomato and D2Cre::Ai14 (tdTomato) mice showing laminar distribution of tdTomato (red) expressing D1+ or D2+ neurons and EYFP or FGr (green) expressing retrogradely labeled projection neurons in the M1 forelimb area (brain slices are 0.5 mm anterior to the bregma). Scale bars, 50 μm. See also for analysis of laminar distributions. (D) Cell density of D1+ neurons plotted as a function of distance from pia (where pia = 0 and white matter = 1; therefore, <0.5 indicates cells clustered in the upper layers, while >0.5 indicates cells clustered in the deep layers). (E) Colocalization of D1+ neurons with different populations of projection neurons. Percentage of D1+ neurons indicates colabeled cells across all layers that are also EYFP+ (% [D1+ EYFP+] / D1+) or FGr+ (% [D1+ FGr+] / D1+). Percentage of EYFP+ neurons indicates cells that are also D1+ (% [D1+ EYFP+] / EYFP+), and percentage of FGr+ neurons indicates cells that are D1+ (% [D1+ FGr+] / FGr+). (F) Comparison of labeling specificity of rAAV2-retro and FGr tracers measured by the number of cells labeled by each tracer. (G–I) Same as (D)–(F) for D2Cre mice. In (D)–(I), data were obtained from 21 D1-tdTomato and 19 D2Cre::Ai14 animals (2–3 mice per injection site, 4 slices per animal, slices were collected from −0.10 mm posterior to 1.00 mm anterior to the bregma). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Paired t test; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Two-way ANOVA; multiple comparisons: EYFP mean vs. FGr mean; Bonferroni’s post hoc test; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗ p < 0.01. (B–I) cM1 (primary motor cortex injection, M1 forelimb area contralateral to the injection site); cDLS (DLS injection, M1 forelimb area contralateral to the injection site); iDLS (dorsolateral striatum injection, M1 forelimb area ipsilateral to the injection site); iThal (thalmus injection, M1 forelimb area ipsilateral to the injection site); iPN (pontine nucleus injection, M1 forelimb area ipsilateral to the injection site).
Techniques Used: Injection, Expressing, Labeling, Comparison
Related Articles
Transgenic Assay:Article Title: Behavior‐ and Cell Type‐Specific Cortico‐Striatal Decoupling in a Parkinson's Disease‐Like Mouse Model Article Snippet: .. C57BL/6J mice were purchased from Shanghai Lingchang Biotechnology Co., Ltd. BAC Assay:Article Title: An oxytocin-gated circuit from the hypothalamus silences olfactory tubercle neurons to drive prosocial grooming Article Snippet: Oxytocin-Ires Cre mice (strain # 024234; OXT-Cre) and Oxtr flox/flox mice (B6.129(SJL)- Oxtr tm1.1Wsy /J; strain #008471; originally donated by Dr. W. Scott Young III -National Institute of Mental Health ) were from were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory. .. Bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)-transgenic D1-Cre [MMRRC Tg(Drd1a-cre)EY262Gsat] and Mutagenesis:Article Title: Altered excitability and glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the medium spiny neurons of the nucleus accumbens in mice deficient in the heparan sulfate endosulfatase Sulf1 Article Snippet: 165 Sulf1 KO mice, Sulf1tm1Mmas (MGI 5318489), were generated by insertion of 166 a cassette of stop-IRES-lacZ-polyA into the Sulf1 gene using homologous 167 recombination in ES cells, and Sulf1 mRNA was shown to be completely 168 abolished in the KO mice (Nagamine et al., 2012). .. Drd1-Cre, B6.FVB(Cg)-169 Tg(Drd1-cre)EY262Gsat/Mmucd (MGI 4358480), and Drd2-Cre, B6.FVB(Cg)-170 Tg( Article Title: N-Ethylmaleimide-Sensitive Factor Deletion in Dopamine D2 Receptor Cells and Associated Neuronal and Behavioural Changes in Mice Article Snippet: .. The other:Article Title: The role of dopamine-sensitive motor cortical circuits in the development and execution of skilled forelimb movements Article Snippet: D2Cre: B6.FVB(Cg)-Tg(Drd2-cre)ER44Gsat/Mmucd , |
![(A, B). Single-cell dose-response curves for (A) Gαs-coupled DRD1 and <t>(B)</t> <t>Gαi-coupled</t> <t>DRD2</t> in CHO-K1::cAMPinG1 cells transiently expressing HALO-tagged receptors. DRD2 was stimulated in the presence of 10 µM forskolin to elevate the baseline cAMP level. Cells are binned and colored by their measured surface receptor abundance (arbitrary flow-cytometry units; see color bars). Solid lines represent joint fits of the operational model (R 2 = 0.98 for DRD1; R 2 = 0.97 for DRD2) with binding affinity (Kd) locked to established IUPHAR values (fit values and 95% CIs are provided in ). Data represent per-bin medians, with error bars indicating ±1 SEM across independent replicate dates (n = 4 for DRD1, n = 5 for DRD2). The remaining subtypes <t>(DRD3,</t> <t>DRD4,</t> DRD5) are characterized in Fig. S3. (C, D) DRD1 dopamine dose-response under siRNA knockdown of Gαs at (C) 1 nM and (D) 33 nM siGNAS (ΔGs), overlaid on the wild-type Gαs response, binned by surface DRD1 abundance (colors as in A). Solid lines are the shared-parameter operational-model fit in which only the available transducer pool [Gs] varies per condition ; Gαs depletion right-shifts the curves along the dose axis without lowering the maximal response. (E). Schematic of the modified operational model. Ligand binding ([L]) yields a fractional receptor occupancy (ρ). This fraction is multiplied by the measured surface receptor abundance ([R]) to yield a composite signaling drive (D = [R] · [G] · ρ). The drive is processed through a saturable Hill-type transducer function (S) to compute the final integrated cAMP output (y). Full mathematical derivation is provided in the Supplementary Information. (F). Master-curve collapse across receptor abundances. Plotting the normalized transducer output (S) against the composite signaling drive (D) collapses the variable dose-response families onto a single, invariant master curve for each receptor subtype. This confirms that cellular cAMP responses are governed by the combined drive quantity rather than receptor density or ligand concentration independently.](https://bio-rxiv-images-cdn.bioz.com/dois_ending_with_56/10__64898_slash_2026__07__10__737756/10__64898_slash_2026__07__10__737756___F3.large.jpg)
